mattbombers
Senior Member
that would be hard...
espacialy getting a line that long...
espacialy getting a line that long...
I use mine a bit mostly to reduce the strain on the motor when I down shift into a corner. It helps to stabilise the rear and reduce the compresion lock, Having said that I have seen some fast bikes/riders that dont have any back brakes like no_crf50_here for example. I personaly like to have rear brakes for those ohhh SH!7 moments. At lakeside we are geting over 100kph (I am told) when I have a brain fart moment at the end of the main and run onto the green stuff it's nice to have rears to help save the situation.
Tina
A very good copy I might add ...
I cant comment on the atomik frame but up until recently i had an 05/06 Provert which also runs the BBR clone frame as my spare bike and that thing went through hell and back being run around as a motard and being flogged through all sorts of crap while on dirt setup duties with no problems at all.The thing was bullet proof.
Naa question was for Punisher vert .... he knows what her's talking about when it comes to metal fabrication and is no slouch around bikes eiother so I was interested to hear what he had to say about em . As I said the pegs on atomix used to be set waaaay too high and it really stuffed the ergos but it sounds like maybe they may have fixed em ?
Did they fix the ergo's ? ... Atomik bbr copies used to have the pegs set waaaaay too high and that used too screw up the ergo's .... not really the same quality materials either ? ... just that tj's klx is the only bbr I've ever seen bend ... and that was after wrecking on a flip at 120ft ....and I've sure seen a few Atomiks bend .
Not hassling punisher, bike looks good but I'm sceptical that Atomiks bbr copy is anywhere near as good as a real bbr .... after all you can buy 6 atomik bikes for less than the price of a real bbr rolling setup.