well, after comparing them, i think your JB weld idea is going to be the better one.
Except that it seems the head volume of my loncin is ALOT more than the ducar head. But im thinking the valve sizes and port sizes will make up for the loss in compression... but now im going to have to think about a high compression piston... Heres a comparison of valves an ports:
Ducar head -Intake- Valve: 27mm
Inside Seat: 23mm
Manifold end of port: 29mm
Manifold: 22mm
-Exhaust- Valve: 22mm
Seat: 20mm
Pipe end: 24mm
Loncin Head -Intake- Valve: 23mm
Seat: 19mm
Manifold end: 21mm
Manifold: 24mm
-Exhaust- Valve: 20mm
Seat: 17mm
Pipe end: 20mm
So the ducar has a 4mm bigger valve and seat than the loncin. But the opening to the port is a bit too big, and there is that little lip just before teh valve. But that lip is even bigger on the loncin coz of the tiny seat.
The ducar also has a 2mm larger exhaust valve and 3mm larger seat than the loncin. I have also done about 1/2 the porting work on the ducar. How ever the loncin head has alot of metal to play with in its ports, but there is about a 2mm step from the port surface to the seat.
But the ducar has a higher head volume and therefore will give the engine less compression as opposed to the loncin head. but i think overall the gains in port and valve size with the ducar will outweigh the loss in compression which i will eventually regain with a high comp piston or machineing of stock head and barrel.
I think i will stick with the ducar, go and get some of that JB weld and close up the port a little and reshape it to a good size to suit the manifold.
Is there anything im missing with these small valve heads that might be better than the ducar?